The Government has agreed to a review of the sedition provisions in the new year by the Australian Law Reform Commission

Okay, I'll wait until then.

John Howard says the sedition provisions do not substantially differ to what is already contained in the Crimes Act. Disingenuous bastard: if they are not substantially different to what is in the Crimes Act, why did they also need to be in this Act?

And aren't the sedition provisions in the crimes act the ones that poeple have been saying are an anacronism and should be repealed?